…and one of the mod boards…This article made me want to buy a Casio F-91W.
Can they build it as a watch buckle that I can attach to a watch strap (as the “buckle”) so I can use it with my mechanical watch?? Think those folding clasps that metal bracelets use.
Same here. I had the OG Pebble, the Time Steel, and the Pebble 2. I would add that the applications could be quite sophisticated as well, minus the interface of course.I got my first Pebble almost 10 years ago. I used them the hardware failed - either the batteries, or the buttons.
The Pebble series was a cross between a normal digital watch and a smartwatch. It had amazing battery life (up to 10 days, depending on watch face). It could handle notifications. It had a high contrast always-on screen. It could run lightweight apps (timer), show notifications, and control media. The watch faces were very customizable - much more than the Apple watch is now.
They also have a barometer, GPS tracking for runs and bike rides, basic workout tracking, heart rate and sleep monitoring, media control, custom watch faces and more than a week's battery life. All for half the price of these new Pebbles. They're tough as nails too, I've taken them surfing and swimming in the sea for years without them breaking.Amazfit smart watches (TRex 3 i think) get up to 21 days, with an OLED touchscreen and way more health tracking features. But I do love the retro-plasticky pebble look though.
Thanks for mentioning this, I didn't know that was a thing. Now I'm tempted to buy one of these instead.…and one of the mod boards…
I have purchased two watches since 2011, a Casio (albeit a World Time, not an F-91W) and an Apple Watch. Wearing the Casio never stuck, as much as I like it as an object, but the Apple Watch did, at least when I leave the house.I find those numbers dubious. For the Casio F-91W, they just took the 3 million units produced number from 2011, and multiplied by the number of years since release (1989). It's hard to believe that there are 3 times as many Apple Watches (of any generation) in the world than there are F-91Ws, especially as the Apple Watch costs at least 30x more.
EDIT 300x -> 30x.
Also remember that the ECG reading on the Apple Watch requires touching the crown with a finger from the other hand, and can only ever be the equivalent of a two-lead ECG at that. That is, It's not regularly taking your ECG in the background and it doesn't get the level of detail about the heart that the one the EMTs carry gets.Likely not for a $10 watch from AliExpress, but you might be surprised how accurate today even the $50+ watches are. I know it's purely anecdata, but I've compared the readings of one to both a hospital‑grade‑certified SpO2 meter and a portable hospital‑grade‑certified ECG (holter) HR readings, and at least for SpO2 and HR, even the relatively cheaper smart watch I tried was quite close. I certainly wouldn't trust a cheap watch's ECG, but for the other metrics, they weren't off that much in my anecdotal experience.
Of course, that's still purely n=1 anecdata, so take it with a grain of salt. But our cheaper one for a relative did indeed sound the loud alarm on detecting a sudden bradycardia during their sleep, waking them up and letting them not only to try to manage it, but also waking up their SO enough to call the A&E's ambulance for proper ECG assessment and medication.
Of course a fully certified ECG smart watch would have likely been much better, but the current Apple Watch with ECG is totally out of our means (as it would also mean replacing most of their older Apple HW with new iPhones and other stuff over what they already have, as their older HW doesn't really work with the new ones).
My 2022 Amazfit Bip S had 30-40 day battery life along with GPS tracking and step counter and could get notifications but not respond to them (like the latest Pebble). It had a dim, limited color VGA type screen but I felt it was kind of retro like... it was discontinued in 2023 I think due to limited sales as despite some people people saying they want ultra long battery life above all else in their devices, the majority of people choose features as a higher priority (and battery life as a second priority). Hence Apple Watch sells well.. but so does Apple Watch Ultra (feature, better battery life) and Garmin (which have like 7-10 days) and Amazfit has newer more featured models with 7-21 day battery life.What other smart watches boast a 30-day battery life? I think that alone is probably a killer feature, isn't it?
And that's 30 day life WITH an always-on screen, since it's e-ink. That's a killer feature to me - the time is always visible, like a WATCH is supposed to be, without having to raise my arm, twist my wrist, or push a button.What other smart watches boast a 30-day battery life? I think that alone is probably a killer feature, isn't it?
I never had a Pebble and don't plan to (I had an Amazfit and now an Apple Watch), but to me the benefits are an always on screen that is easy in the sun at any angle along with battery life (you could boost an Apple Watch display brightness, but battery life would drop), the screen is also not overly bright at night, and hackability (not only load your apps easily, but the OS itself is open-source and changeable).I have read through the announcement, but it doesn't really sell it to somebody without any Pebble experience like me (never had one, not sure they have even sold much in Europe, if at all).
ELI5, apart from the battery life, what are its actual killer features and apps as a smart watch?
It's certainly not a health‑monitoring watch, so there's one very useful feature out (a cheap health‑monitoring watch once literally saved my relative's life).
Is it notifications? Yes, I can get that, notifications with a month of battery life sounds great, but my phone has a day's battery life and already vibrates in my pocket on important notifications.
Is it sports? No, they themselves clearly state it's not a sports watch either.
What else, then? Some killer app? Style? Nostalgia? That it's a cool product (and it indeed looks like a cool product and a result of lot of developer love!)?
Trying to get my head around it. It looks rather nice, I really like their dedication, but don't really see me buying one at the moment, the way it's marketed. Perhaps I am just missing something, hence this post.
Ta!
I had a Pebble Time till the battery died. I opened it up, replaced the battery, and kept it alive. When it finally died again, I bought another one from ebay. (and by died, I mean the battery was ONLY giving 3-5 days life). It's THAT good.I have read through the announcement, but it doesn't really sell it to somebody without any Pebble experience like me (never had one, not sure they have even sold much in Europe, if at all).
ELI5, apart from the battery life, what are its actual killer features and apps as a smart watch?
It's certainly not a health‑monitoring watch, so there's one very useful feature out (a cheap health‑monitoring watch once literally saved my relative's life).
Is it notifications? Yes, I can get that, notifications with a month of battery life sounds great, but my phone has a day's battery life and already vibrates in my pocket on important notifications.
Is it sports? No, they themselves clearly state it's not a sports watch either.
What else, then? Some killer app? Style? Nostalgia? That it's a cool product (and it indeed looks like a cool product and a result of lot of developer love!)?
Trying to get my head around it. It looks rather nice, I really like their dedication, but don't really see me buying one at the moment, the way it's marketed. Perhaps I am just missing something, hence this post.
Ta!
Oh, all of the people I knew with Pebbles were giant nerds. Big overlap with Android early adopters, too, back when a Droid was the nerdiest phone you could buy outside Japan.IMO pebble is a pretty… nerdy brand, right? Like it is some early-adopter tech product that kicked off/was slightly too early to catch the smartwatch wave (for some generous definition of “wave”).
What you're missing is that what you are interpreting as a lack of features is actually the killer feature. There are a contingent of people who want the basic functionality of a smart watch (displaying the time, notifications, alarms, timer/stopwatch) without all the extraneous "health", "fitness", and other crap that bloat and drain the batteries of most smart watches on the market. I'm one of that contingent, although I missed out on the original Pebble.Yes, it doesn't sound like a product for me, but I am still interested in what I might be missing, if anything. Having no experience with the prior Pebble at all, after all.
Withings Scanwatch 2 also promises 30-day battery life.What other smart watches boast a 30-day battery life? I think that alone is probably a killer feature, isn't it?
It's also $350 (plus optional monthly subscription!), and I'm not sure I'd even call it a smartwatch. It does a lot of cool health monitoring things, but has a tiny screen and not even a mention of any type of notifications or normal "smartwatch" features.Withings Scanwatch 2 also promises 30-day battery life.
My OG Pebble died the same way. It was a common problem unfortunately. They did replace mine though. I might have been an early victim or something.I wish them the best of luck as any competition is good. But with my past experience with the Pebble Steel, I'll refrain from buying myself.
My brief story: I pre-ordered the Pebble Steel and was excited to get it. I'm even wearing it in the pictures of me proposing to my wife. But... that watch was nothing but problem after problem. I opened multiple support cases for issues with pairing problems, alert issues, etc. Eventually it failed completely a little over a year after purchase with the primary symptom being a "garbled" screen. Ultimately, the best Pebble support would do is give me a couple good for 25% off any item on their store... or the same discount I could get just buying the watch off Amazon or at Best Buy.
So, I wish them well, but will also issue a word of caution for anybody who wants to be an early adopter.
Thanks, that explains it nicely. Still not a product for me, but at least I can see the appeal to some people!I had a Pebble Time till the battery died. I opened it up, replaced the battery, and kept it alive. When it finally died again, I bought another one from ebay. (and by died, I mean the battery was ONLY giving 3-5 days life). It's THAT good.
Since the second Time finally died, I have tried many watches - Amazfits, no-name, and some more expensive ones too. Here's the differences:
1. The Pebbles are far better at BEING A WATCH since they have always-on screens. No weird wrist movements or buttons to just see the time.
2. The notifications were rock solid for me on Android. No other watch I've tried since has worked as well. The layout on the Pebble showed more text from the message than anything else and it just worked.
3. The vibration was way stronger. Even working in a factory I'd feel it. Every watch I've tried since was weak enough that sometimes I miss the notification because I'm doing something where I don't feel it.
4. I don't care about fitness tracking, so all those features are clutter in the menu and a waste of battery life to me.
5. Physical buttons as an interface! You could use it without looking - such as having preset text replies, so when you got a message, you could blindly send back an "im driving" or similar text. Or a quick glance to see the message, and then send an "ok" without having to keep looking at it. You could also set the buttons to do things like music control, again, without looking.
6. The smart alarm!!!!!!! I haven't found another watch that implements this well, and only like 1 or 2 that has it at all. Basically, since it's already tracking your sleep, if you set a smart alarm for 7am, it'll wake you somewhere between 6:30 and 7. If it senses you moving or otherwise being in light sleep, it'll go off then so you're always waking up at a good part of your sleep cycle. Obviously this isn't a feature for the snooze-button hitting crowd, but for me, it was amazing. I felt better every day because of that.
Most smartwatches today are typing to be a second phone. I don't need that; I've already GOT a phone in my pocket. If I want something with lots of features, I'll use that. I want my watch to be simple, reliable, and just do a few things really well.
Needless to say, I ordered. In fact, I ordered one of each model because I didn't want to wait until December to get one! My current Amazfit's days are numbered....
So I don't think that disagree with what they stated:On iPhones, ANCS allows BLE peripherals to receive and react to notifications on the phone without having to develop a companion app. Even if the official Pebble OS does not support it, I'm sure someone will make a 3rd party firmware for it (assuming the watches support flashing custom firmware).
The only difference seems like it seems like it could be possible to react to a notification per what you said.
- A 2025 Pebble cannot:
- Send SMS or iMessage text
- Reply or otherwise act on notifications
- Keep a connection alive if the user closes (swipes up on) the Pebble app
- Separate or mute watch notifications while a phone is in use
- Run a JavaScript engine on the watch OS, which complicates development
- Keep notifications hidden on an iPhone lockscreen and still show on a Pebble
As a deaf person I don't take my watch off my wrist, since it's also my vibrating alarm clock.If my Galaxy Watch (1) dies, I'd be in the market for these. Simple, always-on display, charge once a week or less, designed for notifications and time... they're pefect.
I don't need fifty sensors telling me how I slept or that my heart rate is higher when moving around than when sitting still, or trying to call the police when it thinks I've fallen down. I suspect most of the people with smartwatches are in the same boat.
Thanks. That kind of info really should be on the website, the FAQ makes it sound like they are sent from the US.Eric mentioned in an AMA that international orders would not ship from the US
Thank you for making this post to say what I wished I could much more of:And... is Intel okay with the "Core 2 Duo" trademark being used like this? My tinfoil hat mind says this is a ploy to get in the news when the lawyers get involved, then graciously change it.
My other mind says it's because the Core 2 Duo is old and nobody remembers those CPUs anymore.
As an Apple Watch user, the Pebble seems like it could replace it, but unfortunately it cannot:I’ve come to realise I mainly use my Apple Watch for 2 things: a large readable date and time display, and a vibration for notifications. It has to be reliable at that. Maybe pebble can do those things but the iOS restrictions probably still hurt them.
On the other hand Apple Watch has a weak-ish vibration and tries to be too clever about notifications; simply mirroring the phone notifications exactly is actually what I want.
Or think I want. The funny thing with smart watches is most people find they don’t need very much, but what they do need has to be extremely reliable and slick otherwise it doesn’t make sense to have it in a watch.
Those brokerage fees are killer, agreed. It's crazy - by the time you pay for them, the cost would have added up to the point that you might as well have bought something local, and for cheaper.I started using my pebble steel again, but I just can't pull the trigger on this one.
If the design was more like the pebble steel, I'd go for it, the one thing I don't like about the OG steel is that the screen is too small.
The final nail in the coffin for me was shipping,"All international shipments will be sent via courier (DHL, Fedex, UPS) with tracking. Be prepared - your country will likely charge you taxes, customs and duties fees".
I refuse to buy from any company that doesn't take care of the paperwork and fee/tax collection. Shipping companies charge exorbitant rates to individuals for "handling" the required paperwork etc. I know there are cheaper ways to get around it, but I really can't be bothered.
Anything that's medical-grade would have multiple leads and points. Of course there's no way it'll do the equivalent of what they have in the hospital, but it is still something nonetheless. I know reddit haters will jump up and down and insist that "no NO the Apple Watch didn't save you, you would have gone to the doctor anyways".Also remember that the ECG reading on the Apple Watch requires touching the crown with a finger from the other hand, and can only ever be the equivalent of a two-lead ECG at that. That is, It's not regularly taking your ECG in the background and it doesn't get the level of detail about the heart that the one the EMTs carry gets.
That's a nice thought, but if so, I'd rather wait for that someone to develop it. There's a saying that goes "never buy a device for what they promise". In this case it's not a promise but rather something that could potentially happen.On iPhones, ANCS allows BLE peripherals to receive and react to notifications on the phone without having to develop a companion app. Even if the official Pebble OS does not support it, I'm sure someone will make a 3rd party firmware for it (assuming the watches support flashing custom firmware).
Yeah it could be possible. But will it happen? That's hard to say. It's a qualified maybe.So I don't think that disagree with what they stated:
The only difference seems like it seems like it could be possible to react to a notification per what you said.
Wow thanks! That’s really cool and exactly what I’m looking for. Unfortunately it looks like it’s discontinued and doubly so, I’m on an iPhone so Gadgetbridge won’t work.What you're asking for is a Sony wena band. It's even got support in Gadgetbridge.
The payment system is one of the few drawbacks to Garmin's watches. They have their own scheme. It requires you to enter a PIN, which is such a fiddly thing to do on a watch that I don't bother with it. Supposedly you only have to do it once per day (or if the watch is removed from your wrist), but as I rarely do more than one payment a day that doesn't help.As an Apple Watch user, the Pebble seems like it could replace it, but unfortunately it cannot:
- Mirror notifications from my iPhone. I don't mean just iMessage, but also 2-factor authentication stuff too. Just tapping your Apple Watch to answer the 2-factor prompt is really nice. People seem to think that you have to have an equivalent app for the Apple Watch to be able to do this, and it's not true. I can respond to everything from Discord messages to anything I can think of, right from my Apple Watch if I so chose.
- Apple Pay. I just double-tap the button, hold my wrist over the payment terminal and I'm done. I haven't looked too far to see if Pebble has the equivalent of a digital wallet, but Apple Pay is incredibly seamless and well-executed.
This is one of those things that you'd have to try in order to see if you're missing the Apple Watch for anything after you try the Pebble. But more likely than not, you'll notice - oh something's missing that I had before, and it either requires all kinds of workarounds to get it to function the way the Apple Watch just works...or you just decide you can live without that feature.
Actually, "really old Intel CPU" was the very first thing that popped into my mind when I saw "Core 2 Duo." Maybe I'm just really old, myself?And... is Intel okay with the "Core 2 Duo" trademark being used like this? My tinfoil hat mind says this is a ploy to get in the news when the lawyers get involved, then graciously change it.
My other mind says it's because the Core 2 Duo is old and nobody remembers those CPUs anymore.